See: https://github.com/testdouble/standard
StandardRB is to RuboCop what StandardJS is to ESLint. This commit
naively copies the RuboCop linter and fixer to point at the standardrb
executable. Any other adjustments are very minor (the only I can think
of is that standardrb takes a `--fix` option instead of
`--auto-correct`).
This raises a confusing point to me as both developer and a user: since
ale enables all linters by default, won't this run both RuboCop and
StandardRB (the results of which will almost always be in conflict with
one another)? How does ale already solve for this for the similar case
of StandardJS and ESLint?
The linter can correctly parse pydocstyle output with any of the following
command-line options enabled: --explain, --source, --debug, and/or
--verbose
The command used to invoke the LSP process was being escaped wrong.
Also added a new option to set a different java executable and fixed the
documentation.
- Add g:ale_virtualtext_cursor boolean to enable/disable it
- Add g:ale_virtualtext_prefix to configure what prefix to use (default:
'> ')
- Requires neovim 0.3.2's unreleased API `nvim_buf_set_virtual_text`
This adds generic configuration dictionary support to the elixir-ls
linter. This is useful for disabling its built-in Dialyzer support, for
example, which can improve startup time.
The configuration dictionary is a little verbose. I considered reducing
the user configuration to only the nested settings dictionary (and
having the linter implementation wrap it in the top-level `elixirLS`
dictionary), but leaving it fully configurable simplifies the code and
removes any assumptions about current or future ElixirLS behavior.
This is the callback-based variant of the existing `lsp_config` linter
option. It serves the same purpose but can be used when more complicated
processing is needed.
`lsp_config` and `lsp_config_callback` are mutually exclusive options;
if both an given, a linter preprocessing error will be raised.
The runtime logic has been wrapped in `ale#lsp_linter#GetConfig` for
convenience, similar to `ale#lsp_linter#GetOptions`.
This also adds documentation and an `AssertLSPConfig` test function for
completeness.
* add prolog/swipl linter
* use load_files/2 instead of read_term/2
Because it also checks some semantic warnings / errors
not only syntactic warnings / errors.
e.g.:
* singleton warning
* discontiguous warning
* ...
cf. http://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=style_check/1
* support error messages with no line number
:- module(module_name, [pred/0]).
causes
ERROR: Exported procedure module_name:pred/0 is not defined
* add test for prolog/swipl handler
* cosmetic fixes
* detect timeout using SIGALRM
* rename g:prolog_swipl_goals to g:prolog_swipl_load
* write doc for prolog/swipl linter
* update toc and README
* fix ignore patterns
