ale#Escape function seems to prepend and append ' to the file name, which
are not present in the pydocstyle output. Having the parsing regexp match
the file name was overkill anyway, since there is an obvious 1:1
correspondence between the buffer number and the (potential) errors
reported by pydocstyle.
* Add support for https://github.com/saibing/bingo
* Add docs for ale-go-bingo
* Use go.mod when found
* Add test for bingo FindProjectRoot
* Simplify ale_linters#go#bingo#GetCommand
With earlier elm versions, a separate package file is maintained for
tests, which when properly configured enabled the compiler to find what
it needed to compile the tests. Under elm 0.19, test dependencies are
managed in the top-level package file, so `elm make` will fail on the
tests. `elm-test make` is required in this case.
See https://github.com/elm-explorations/test/issues/64
- added a cd into the direcotry containing the file in the buffer
in order to properly check for a config file
- added command_callback tests for graphql
In some situations, errors reported by `perl -c` can have multiple
listings of "at <file> line <number>". If the l:pattern is changed to
use non-greedy matching it will also match these.
For example:
```
use strict;
use DateTime;
$asdf=1;
```
Results in:
```
Global symbol "$asdf" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $asdf"?) at /Users/mgrimes/t.pl line 3, <DATA> line 1.
/Users/mgrimes/t.pl had compilation errors.
```
I am not 100% sure why `perl -c` generates errors with the extra "file
line <num>". It only happens in some versions of perl when certain
modules are used.
See: https://github.com/testdouble/standard
StandardRB is to RuboCop what StandardJS is to ESLint. This commit
naively copies the RuboCop linter and fixer to point at the standardrb
executable. Any other adjustments are very minor (the only I can think
of is that standardrb takes a `--fix` option instead of
`--auto-correct`).
This raises a confusing point to me as both developer and a user: since
ale enables all linters by default, won't this run both RuboCop and
StandardRB (the results of which will almost always be in conflict with
one another)? How does ale already solve for this for the similar case
of StandardJS and ESLint?
It's common to add SwiftLint as a CocoaPod dependency, instead of as a global
binary. In this case we should use that version of SwiftLint before looking
for any others. Note that I'm also adding support for SwiftLint in ReactNative
projects here as well, where the Pods directory would be nested inside an ios
directory.
The linter can correctly parse pydocstyle output with any of the following
command-line options enabled: --explain, --source, --debug, and/or
--verbose
The command used to invoke the LSP process was being escaped wrong.
Also added a new option to set a different java executable and fixed the
documentation.
The output format used by older checkstyle versions differs from the one
of new versions. This commit adds a second parsing iteration on the
output lines with a suitable pattern to support both versions in
parallel. Due to the differences in the order of matching groups this is
hard to achieve in a single pass through the output lines.
An appropriate test case is added.
Previously, elixir-ls would treat each sub-project within an umbrella as
standalone, which isn't desirable from a language server perspective.
Added ale#handlers#elixir#FindMixUmbrellaRoot, which locates the current
project's root and then continues searching upwards for a potential
umbrella project root. This literally looks just two levels up to keep
things simple while keeping in line with Elixir project conventions.
Use this new function to determine elixir-ls's LSP project root.
* Allow configuration of hamllint executable
The hamllint executable was hard-coded, preventing it from being
overridden. Fix the executable to be dynamic to allow custom executable
paths.
This adds generic configuration dictionary support to the elixir-ls
linter. This is useful for disabling its built-in Dialyzer support, for
example, which can improve startup time.
The configuration dictionary is a little verbose. I considered reducing
the user configuration to only the nested settings dictionary (and
having the linter implementation wrap it in the top-level `elixirLS`
dictionary), but leaving it fully configurable simplifies the code and
removes any assumptions about current or future ElixirLS behavior.
* add prolog/swipl linter
* use load_files/2 instead of read_term/2
Because it also checks some semantic warnings / errors
not only syntactic warnings / errors.
e.g.:
* singleton warning
* discontiguous warning
* ...
cf. http://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=style_check/1
* support error messages with no line number
:- module(module_name, [pred/0]).
causes
ERROR: Exported procedure module_name:pred/0 is not defined
* add test for prolog/swipl handler
* cosmetic fixes
* detect timeout using SIGALRM
* rename g:prolog_swipl_goals to g:prolog_swipl_load
* write doc for prolog/swipl linter
* update toc and README
* fix ignore patterns
* Only run stack if a stack.yaml config is found
It is necessary to check for a stack.yaml file to distinguish between
cabal-only projects or stack projects (which are also cabal projects
since stack is built on top of cabal).
* Test that stack is called if stack.yaml exists
ElixirLS (https://github.com/JakeBecker/elixir-ls) is an LSP server for
Elixir. It's distributed as a release package that can be downloaded
from https://github.com/JakeBecker/elixir-ls/releases or built locally.
The easiest way to start it is via Unix- and Win32-specific helper
scripts, so that's the basis of this command integration. Alternatively,
we could implement the contents of those platform-specific scripts in
the linter's command callback in a language-neutral way, but there isn't
any benefit to doing that aside from eliminating the platform check, and
that could prove to be too tight of a coupling going forward.
* FIX: use mix from the project root directory
* Move find root project function to autoloaded handlers
* add tests for #ale#handlers#elixr#FindMixProjectRoot
PMD is currently not working properly for Java classes that use [unnamed
packages](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se11/html/jls-7.html#jls-7.4.2).
Consider the following Java class that does not contain a `package`
declaration:
```java
public class App {
String getGreeting() {
return "Hello world.";
}
static void main(String... args) {
System.out.println(new App().getGreeting());
}
}
```
Running PMD in the command line agaist the Java class above produces an
output with empty string `""` in the `"Package"` column:
```sh
$ pmd -R category/java/bestpractices.xml -f csv -d './src/main/java/App.java'
Oct 02, 2018 9:10:39 PM net.sourceforge.pmd.PMD processFiles
WARNING: This analysis could be faster, please consider using Incremental Analysis: https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.7.0/pmd_userdocs_incremental_analysis.html
"Problem","Package","File","Priority","Line","Description","Rule set","Rule"
"1","","/Users/diego/Projects/github.com/dlresende/kata-fizz-buzz/src/main/java/App.java","2","7","System.out.println is used","Best Practices","SystemPrintln"
```
But the pmd.vim handler's current pattern refuses everything coming
from a Java class that does not have a package name (2nd column):
```vim
let l:pattern = '"\(\d\+\)",".\+","\(.\+\)","\(\d\+\)","\(\d\+\)","\(.\+\)","\(.\+\)","\(.\+\)"$'
```
The solution I am proposing is to also accept empty strings as package names.
* Add better support for Haskell stack compiler tools
This commit adds support for `stack` as the executable of a tool. This
follows a pattern that has been implemented for `bundler`'s tool chain.
* Move hlint command to linter file
* Add vader test for stack exec handling
* Update ghc-mod to support stack execution
`ghc-mod` was previously broken into 2 linters.
1. ghc_mod
2. stack_ghc_mod
This additional linter is not necessary with proper support for
executable variables and `stack exec` handling.
* Support stack exec in hfmt
* Support stack in hdevtools
In a lint context, it's useful to assume that included files sit next to
the current file by default. Users can still further customize this
configuration variable to add more include paths.
When set to true, and the buffer is currently inside a pipenv,
GetExecutable will return "pipenv", which will trigger the existing
functionality to append the correct pipenv arguments to run each linter.
Defaults to false.
I was going to implement ale#python#PipenvPresent by invoking
`pipenv --venv` or `pipenv --where`, but it seemed to be abominably
slow, even to the point where the test suite wasn't even finishing
("Tried to run tests 3 times"). The diff is:
diff --git a/autoload/ale/python.vim b/autoload/ale/python.vim
index 7baae079..8c100d41 100644
--- a/autoload/ale/python.vim
+++ b/autoload/ale/python.vim
@@ -106,5 +106,9 @@ endfunction
" Detects whether a pipenv environment is present.
function! ale#python#PipenvPresent(buffer) abort
- return findfile('Pipfile.lock', expand('#' . a:buffer . ':p:h') . ';') isnot# ''
+ let l:cd_string = ale#path#BufferCdString(a:buffer)
+ let l:output = systemlist(l:cd_string . 'pipenv --where')[0]
+ " `pipenv --where` returns the path to the dir containing the Pipfile
+ " if in a pipenv, or some error text otherwise.
+ return strpart(l:output, 0, 18) !=# "No Pipfile present"
endfunction
Using vim's `findfile` is much faster, behaves correctly in the majority
of situations, and also works reliably when the `pipenv` command doesn't
exist.
* The project style linter now runs while you type.
* Now the scripts for checking the project require blank lines.
* Many style issues have been found and fixed.
It can be necessary to pass options to the puppet parser validation. The
most glaring example of this is when using Puppet 3, with the
`parser = future` option enabled. This update allows adding
`--parser=future` to the options passed to Puppet.
I see no reason to do this? It is just setting the environment to what
it already is?
It was originally added in #297, but that entire PR is not a great idea
in the first place; that PR (together with #270) tried to make the Go do
non-standard and non-supported stuff like compiling packages outside of
GOPATH.
That's not something that works well (I tried), so was eventually
removed in #465, but these "go env" calls remained, for no reason in
particular, as far as I can think of.
This will improve on #1834; you will now no longer get a confusing error
(but still won't get a meaningful error; need to think how to do that).
