When using a compilation database (compile_commands.json) in very large
projects, significant delays would occur when changing files --
particularly those that happened to be far down the db. Rather than
iterating over the whole list every time, we now build up a lookup table
based on the tail of the filename (and tail of the directory for
widening searches) and iterate over the much smaller list of compile
commands for files with the given name.
Test metrics (from compile_database_perf/test.sh) show a 90% performance
improvement -- from 25 seconds to 2.5 seconds per run.
* Add support for https://github.com/saibing/bingo
* Add docs for ale-go-bingo
* Use go.mod when found
* Add test for bingo FindProjectRoot
* Simplify ale_linters#go#bingo#GetCommand
With earlier elm versions, a separate package file is maintained for
tests, which when properly configured enabled the compiler to find what
it needed to compile the tests. Under elm 0.19, test dependencies are
managed in the top-level package file, so `elm make` will fail on the
tests. `elm-test make` is required in this case.
See https://github.com/elm-explorations/test/issues/64
- added a cd into the direcotry containing the file in the buffer
in order to properly check for a config file
- added command_callback tests for graphql
See: https://github.com/testdouble/standard
StandardRB is to RuboCop what StandardJS is to ESLint. This commit
naively copies the RuboCop linter and fixer to point at the standardrb
executable. Any other adjustments are very minor (the only I can think
of is that standardrb takes a `--fix` option instead of
`--auto-correct`).
This raises a confusing point to me as both developer and a user: since
ale enables all linters by default, won't this run both RuboCop and
StandardRB (the results of which will almost always be in conflict with
one another)? How does ale already solve for this for the similar case
of StandardJS and ESLint?
It's common to add SwiftLint as a CocoaPod dependency, instead of as a global
binary. In this case we should use that version of SwiftLint before looking
for any others. Note that I'm also adding support for SwiftLint in ReactNative
projects here as well, where the Pods directory would be nested inside an ios
directory.
The linter can correctly parse pydocstyle output with any of the following
command-line options enabled: --explain, --source, --debug, and/or
--verbose
